Icon Literatur
Icon Zeitschriftenbeitrag

Dokumentart(en): Zeitschriftenbeitrag Forschungsergebnis Online-Publikation
Titel der Veröffentlichung: Effektive rehabilitative Interventionen und Teilhabe von Menschen mit Multipler Sklerose

Ein Überblick über Reviews

Autor/in:

Momsen, Anne-Mette Hedeager; Ørtenblad, Lisbeth; Maribo, Thomas [u. a.]

Herausgeber/in:

k. A.

Quelle:

Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 2022, 65(1)(Article 101529), Amsterdam: Elsevier Masson, ISSN: 1877-0657, eISSN: 1877-0665

Jahr:

2022

Der Text ist von:
Momsen, Anne-Mette Hedeager; Ørtenblad, Lisbeth; Maribo, Thomas [u. a.]

Der Text steht in der Zeitschrift:
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 65(1)(Article 101529)

Den Text gibt es seit:
2022

Online-Publikation anzeigen (DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101529)

Beschreibung:

Das steht in dem Text:

Systematische Zusammenfassung und Evaluation der Evidenz zur Wirksamkeit (effectiveness) von Rehabilitation für Menschen mit Multipler Sklerose (MS) und ihre Teilhabe an der Rehabilitation und im Alltag, als Grundlage für klinische Leitlinien zur Rehabilitation bei MS.

Evidenz zur Effektivität, berichtet in Form klinischer oder von den Teilnehmenden (TN) beurteilter Outcomes, zum Beispiel Körperfunktionen, Funktionsfähigkeit, Aktivitäten und Teilhabe inkl. Lebensqualität.

Zudem werteten die Autor:innen qualitative Reviews zur Frage aus, welche Faktoren Einfluss auf Teilhabe an Rehabilitation und Alltag haben, das heißt die Determinanten von Teilhabe.

Wo bekommen Sie den Text?

Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/annals-of-physical-and...

Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/annals-of-physical-and...

Um Literatur zu beziehen, wenden Sie sich bitte an eine Bibliothek, die Herausgebenden, den Verlag oder an den Buch- und Zeitschriftenhandel.

Effective rehabilitation interventions and participation among people with multiple sclerosis

An overview of reviews

Highlights:
  • Rehabilitation should target individual needs and be performed by experienced teams.
  • Evidence exists for effect of multidisciplinary, cognitive and exercise approaches.
  • To empower pwMS, relatives should be involved in the rehabilitation process.
  • The perspectives of pwMS and effects of interventions do not often coincide.
  • Work influences quality of life, thus vocational rehabilitation should start early.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common cause of non-traumatic disability in people aged 10–65 years. Evidence exists for the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation and exercise. However, the effectiveness of other rehabilitation approaches in MS needs further evaluation. The purposes were to systematically synthesise and evaluate knowledge on effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions and determinants for participation among persons with MS (pwMS) to inform clinical guidelines on rehabilitation.

Joanna Briggs Institute methodology was used. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched for reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses published 2009–2019. All types of rehabilitation interventions provided to pwMS at any time and in all settings were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. The most recently published reviews on mixed and specific modalities were included. The findings were reported in a narrative summary and a mixed-method analysis. Among 108 eligible reviews, 6 qualitative or mixed-method reviews and 66 quantitative were included (total pwMS > 90,000).

This overview provides solid evidence for effectiveness of a spectrum of modalities. Among the modalities, there was strong evidence for the effectiveness of multidisciplinary, cognitive and exercise approaches, physiotherapy, and occupational therapy including full body training on functioning and participation outcomes. Employment significantly influenced quality of life; thus, vocational rehabilitation should be initiated early. The healthcare professionals should identify personal factors including relations and coping, and the rehabilitation process should involve partners or close family.

The mixed-method analysis revealed insufficient consensus between the perspectives of pwMS on their rehabilitation and reported effects indicating that further research should target the experiences of pwMS. Further, results showed that rehabilitation should be patient-centred, focus on the complexity of needs, and be organised and performed by an experienced multidisciplinary team. Evidence-based rehabilitation should be initiated early after pwMS are diagnosed and follow international guidelines.

Referenznummer:

R/ZA0292/0003

Informationsstand: 19.03.2024