Sprungnavigation Tastaturkurzbefehle

Suche und Service

Icon Literatur
Icon Zeitschriftenbeitrag

Dokumentart(en): Zeitschriftenbeitrag Forschungsergebnis Online-Publikation
Titel der Veröffentlichung: First results from post-COVID inpatient rehabilitation

Bibliographische Angaben

Autor/in:

Kupferschmitt, Alexa; Langheim, Eike; Tüter, Haris [u. a.]

Herausgeber/in:

Frontiers Research Foundation

Quelle:

Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 2023, Published online: 23 January 2023, Lausanne, Schweiz: Eigenverlag, ISSN: 2673-6861

Jahr:

2023

Der Text ist von:
Kupferschmitt, Alexa; Langheim, Eike; Tüter, Haris [u. a.]

Der Text steht in der Zeitschrift:
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, Published online: 23 January 2023

Den Text gibt es seit:
2023

Online-Publikation anzeigen (DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.1093871)

Inhaltliche Angaben

Wo bekommen Sie den Text?

Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/rehabilitation-sciences

Weitere Informationen zur Veröffentlichung

Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/rehabilitation-sciences

Um Literatur zu beziehen, wenden Sie sich bitte an eine Bibliothek, die Herausgebenden, den Verlag oder an den Buch- und Zeitschriftenhandel.

First results from post-COVID inpatient rehabilitation

Background:
COVID-19 is associated with various symptoms and psychological involvement in the long term. In view of the multifactorial triggering and maintenance of the post-COVID syndrome, a multimodal therapy with somatomedical and psychotherapeutic content is expedient. This paper compares the psychological stress of post-COVID patients and their course in rehabilitation to psychosomatic and psychocardiological patients.

Method:
Observational study with control-groups and clinical, standardized examination: psychological testing (BDI-II, HELATH-49), 6-MWT as somatic parameter, two measurement points (admission, discharge). Sample characteristics, including work related parameters, the general symptom-load and the course of symptoms during rehabilitation are evaluated.

Results:
At admission in all measures post-COVID patients were significantly affected, but less pronounced than psychosomatic or psychocardiological patients (BDI-II post-COVID = 19.29 ± 9.03, BDI-II psychosomatic = 28.93 ± 12.66, BDI-II psychocardiology = 24.47 ± 10.02). During rehabilitation, in all complaint domains and sub-groups, symptom severity was significantly reduced (effect sizes ranging from d = .34 to d = 1.22). Medium positive effects were seen on self-efficacy (d = .69) and large effects on activity and participation (d = 1.06) in post-COVID patients. In the 6-MWT, the walking distance improved by an average of 76.43 ± 63.58 meters (d = 1.22). Not a single patient deteriorated in walking distance, which would have been a possible sign of post exercise malaise (PEM).

Conclusion:
Post-COVID patients have a slighter psychological burden as psychocardiological or psychosomatic patients. Although rehabilitation is not curative, post-COVID patients benefit significantly from the interventions and there were no signs of PEM.

Referenznummer:

R/ZA0229/0001

Informationsstand: 28.06.2023